RLJIT

|| Sri. Devaraj Urs Educational Trust(R.) ||

R. L. Jalappa Institute of Technology

Approved By AICTE, New Delhi | Affiliated to Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belagavi. Kodigehalli, Doddaballapur-561203,

Bengaluru Rural District, Karnataka, India.

RLJIT

Criterion 1 – Curricular Aspects (100)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator – 1.1 Curricular Planning and Implementation (20)
1.1.1 QlM The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal Assessment 20

Key Indicator- 1.2 Academic Flexibility (30)
1.2.1 QnM Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. (where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years) 15
1.2.2 QnM Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years
1.2.2.1 :Number of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. as against the total number of students during the last five years		 15

Key Indicator- 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30)
1.3.1 QlM Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum 10
1.3.2 QnM Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year)
1.3.2.1 :Number of students undertaking project work/field work / internships		 20

Key Indicator- 1.4 Feedback System (20)
1.4.1 QnM 1.4.1: Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website

A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken& communicated to the relevant bodies and feedback hosted on the institutional website

B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken and communicated to the relevant bodies

C. Feedback collected and analysed

D. Feedback collected

E. Feedback not collected

 10

Criterion 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator- 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
2.1.1 QnM Enrolment percentage
2.1.1.1 Number of students admitted year wise during last five years
2.1.1.2 Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years		 20
2.1.2 QnM Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years)
2.1.2.1: Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)
2.1.2.2: Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State Govt rule year wise during the last five years 		20

Key Indicator- 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40)
2.2.1 QnM 2.2.1: Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
Number of teaching staff / full time teachers year wise during the last five years
40

Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40)
2.3.1 QlM Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process 40

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)
2.4.1 QnM Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.1.1 Number of Sanctioned posts / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during the last five years 		15
2.4.2 QnM Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years 		25

Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)
2.5.1 QlM Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient 40

Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)
2.6.1 QlM 2.6.1: Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website 25
2.6.2 QlM 2.6.2: Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated. 20
2.6.3 QnM Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students) 45

Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)

2.7.1 QnM Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. 60

Criterion 3- Research, Innovations and Extension (110)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator 3.1- Resource Mobilization for Research (10)
3.1.1 QnM Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
3.1.1.1: Total Grants from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) 		10

Key Indicator 3.2- Innovation Ecosystem (15)
3.2.1 QlM Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS),including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident 10
3.2.2 QlM 3.2.2 Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years
3.2.2.1: Total number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship year wise during last five years 		10

Key Indicator 3.3- Research Publication and Awards (25)
3.3.1 QnM Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years
3.3.1.1. Number of research papers in the Journals notified on UGC CARE list year wise during the last five years

Apart from the above:

Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any)

Note: The HEI should indicate in the data template against each paper about the presence of the paper in the UGC CARE Category wise list with CARE journal ID 		10

3.3.2 QnM Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years

Apart from the above:

Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim (if any) 		10

Key Indicator 3.4- Extension Activities (40)
3.4.1 Q l M Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years. 15
3.4.2 Q l M Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognised bodies File Description: 5
3.4.3 Q l M Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years
3.4.3.1. Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years. 		File Description: 20

Key Indicators 3.5 – Collaboration (20)
3.5.1. QlM Number of functional MoUs/linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years
3.5.1.1 Number of functional MoUs / linkages with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years:______ 		20

Criterion 4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities (30)

4.1.1 QlM The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities for, teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc. 20
4.1.2 QnM Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years
4.1.2.1 Expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation, excluding salary year wise during last five years (INR in lakhs) 		10

Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a learning Resource (20)
4.2.1 QlM Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), subscription to e-resources, amount spent on purchase of books, journals and per day usage of library 20

Key Indicator- 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30)
4.3.1 QlM Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection 20
4.3.2 QnM Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 10

Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20)
4.4.1 QnM Percentage of expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical and academic support facilities) excluding salary component during the last five years (INR in Lakhs)
4.4.1.1. Expenditure incurred on maintenance of infrastructure (physical facilities and academic support facilities) excluding salary component year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) 		10

Criterion 5- Student Support and Progression (140)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator- 5.1 Student Support (50)
5.1.1 QnM Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non- government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
Number of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non- government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years 		20
5.1.2 QnM Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organised for improving students’ capability
1. Soft skills
2. Language and communication skills
3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene)
4. ICT/computing skills 		10
5.1.3 QnM Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years
5.1.3.1. Number of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counselling offered by the institution year wise during last five years 		10
5.1.4 QnM The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies
2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance
3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances
4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees 		10

Key Indicator- 5.2 Student Progression (35)
5.2.1 QnM Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years
5.2.1.1. Number of outgoing students placed and / or progressed to higher education year wise during the last five years
5.2.1.2. Number of outgoing students year wise during the last five years 		25
5.2.2 QnM Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years
5.2.2.1. Number of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations year wise during last five years (eg: IIT/JAM/NET/SLET/GATE/GMAT/GPAT/CLAT/CAT/ GRE/TOEFL/ IELTS/Civil Services/State government examinations etc.)
 10

Key Indicator- 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (45)
5.3.1 QnM Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at University / state/ national / international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years
5.3.1.1: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at national/international level (award for a team event should be counted as one) year wise during the last five years 		20
5.3.2 QnM Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years (organised by the institution/other institutions)
5.3.2.1. Number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated year wise during last five years 		25

Key Indicator- 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10)
5.4.1 QlM There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services 10

Criterion 6- Governance, Leadership and Management (100)

Metric No Name Documents Weightage

Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (15)
6.1.1 QlM The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan. 15

Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (12)
6.2.1 QlM The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc. 6
6.2.2 QnM Implementation of e-governance in areas of operations
1. Administration
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination 		4

Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (33)
6.3.1 QlM The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression 6
6.3.2 QnM Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
6.3.2.1. Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years 		12
6.3.3 QnM Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years
6.3.3.1. Total number of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years
6.3.3.2 Number of non-teaching staff year wise during the last five years 		15

Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (10)
6.4.1 QlM Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ non-government organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly(internal and external) 10

Key Indicator- 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
6.5.1 QlM Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities
  • Upload Additional information

  • Provide Link for Additional information
      		•  15
      6.5.2 QnM Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
      1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented
      2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken
      3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
      4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings
      5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc.       		15

      Criterion 7-Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)

      Metric No Name Documents Weightage

      Key Indicator - 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50)
      7.1.1 QlM Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity and Institutional initiatives to celebrate / organize national and international commemorative days, events and festivals during the last five years 10
      7.1.2 QnM The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
      1. Alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
      2. Management of the various types of degradable and nondegradable waste
      3. Water conservation
      4. Green campus initiatives
      5. Disabled-friendly, barrier free environment       		20
      7.1.3 QnM Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1. Green audit / Environment audit
      2. Energy audit
      3. Clean and green campus initiatives
      4. Beyond the campus environmental promotion activities       		10
      7.1.4 QlM Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens 10

      Key Indicator - 7.2 Best Practices (30)
      7.2.1 QlM Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual 30

      Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20)
      7.3.1 QlM Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words 30